Fresno State Removes Cesar Chavez Statue Amid Abuse Allegations

The university covered and then removed the statue following recent claims of sexual misconduct against the civil rights leader.

Mar. 21, 2026 at 12:03am

Fresno State University has removed the statue of civil rights activist Cesar Chavez from its Peace Garden following allegations of sexual abuse against him. The university initially covered the statue with a black cloth when the allegations surfaced earlier this week, then boxed it up, and has now taken it down completely.

Why it matters

The removal of the Cesar Chavez statue from Fresno State's campus is a significant development, as Chavez is a revered figure in the history of the farmworkers' movement and civil rights. The allegations of sexual abuse have prompted the university to take action, reflecting the growing emphasis on addressing past misconduct, even by respected historical figures.

The details

According to reports, Fresno State students have expressed that the alleged actions of Cesar Chavez should not be tolerated. The space where the statue used to stand is now an empty area with dirt inside, surrounded by metal barriers. Just a week ago, the university had held a celebration at the Peace Garden to recognize Chavez's life and legacy.

  • Earlier this week, the allegations of sexual abuse against Cesar Chavez were first made public.
  • On Friday morning, the Cesar Chavez statue was removed completely from Fresno State's Peace Garden.

The players

Cesar Chavez

A civil rights activist and labor leader who co-founded the National Farmworkers Association, now known as the United Farm Workers (UFW).

Fresno State

A public university located in Fresno, California, which had a statue of Cesar Chavez in its Peace Garden.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The alleged actions of Cesar Chavez should not be tolerated.”

— Fresno State students

The takeaway

The removal of the Cesar Chavez statue from Fresno State's campus reflects the growing emphasis on addressing past misconduct, even by respected historical figures. This decision raises important questions about how to reconcile the complex legacies of influential leaders and the need to hold them accountable for any wrongdoing.