Major Food Companies Backslide on Pesticide Commitments

New scorecard finds industry average score plummets as federal protections erode

Mar. 30, 2026 at 12:25am

A glowing, neon outline of a pesticide sprayer or other agricultural equipment, set against a dark background, conceptually representing the backsliding of food companies on pesticide commitments.As federal oversight of pesticides weakens, major food companies are rolling back their own commitments to transparency and sustainability.El Cerrito Today

A new report from shareholder advocacy group As You Sow reveals that major food manufacturers have regressed on pesticide reduction practices and disclosure, with the industry average score falling to just 2.5 out of 27 points. The findings come as the federal government takes steps to shield chemical companies from liability, raising concerns about corporate transparency and accountability around pesticide use.

Why it matters

The backsliding by food companies on pesticide commitments comes at a critical moment, as the federal government is weakening oversight and shielding chemical manufacturers from accountability. This puts consumers, farmworkers, and ecosystems at increased risk, while also increasing supply chain and farm-level risk and decreasing accountability to shareholders.

The details

The updated Pesticides in the Pantry scorecard assessed 17 major food companies across nine key performance indicators related to pesticide transparency, risk reduction, and farmworker protection. Several former industry leaders, including General Mills, ADM, and Conagra, eliminated pesticide-related disclosures and saw their scores plummet. Only four companies - Del Monte, Post Holdings, Lamb Weston, and Nestlé - improved their scores. Notably, zero companies have adopted farmworker protection policies or standards for high-concern pesticides like neonicotinoids.

  • Last month, President Trump signed an executive order invoking the Defense Production Act to designate glyphosate-based herbicides as essential to national security.
  • The proposed 2026 Farm Bill includes provisions that would prohibit states from mandating health warnings on pesticides that differ from EPA-approved labels.
  • The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Monsanto v. Durnell on April 27, a case that could determine whether federal law bars state failure-to-warn lawsuits brought by more than 100,000 plaintiffs who allege glyphosate caused their cancer.

The players

As You Sow

The nation's leading shareholder representative, which released the updated Pesticides in the Pantry scorecard.

President Trump

Signed an executive order invoking the Defense Production Act to designate glyphosate-based herbicides as essential to national security.

Cailin Dendas

Environmental Health Coordinator at As You Sow.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“At a time when federal regulators are weakening oversight and shielding chemical manufacturers from accountability, corporate transparency on pesticide use has never been more important.”

— Cailin Dendas, Environmental Health Coordinator, As You Sow

What’s next

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Monsanto v. Durnell on April 27, a case that could determine whether federal law bars state failure-to-warn lawsuits brought by more than 100,000 plaintiffs who allege glyphosate caused their cancer.

The takeaway

The backsliding by major food companies on pesticide commitments, coupled with the federal government's efforts to shield chemical manufacturers from accountability, raises significant concerns about corporate transparency, consumer and worker safety, and environmental protection. This highlights the need for stronger oversight and accountability measures to ensure the food industry is prioritizing sustainability and public health.