Trump's Nuclear Fusion Investments Raise Serious Ethical Concerns

The former president's financial ties to the nuclear industry he has championed could pose conflicts of interest and public safety risks.

Mar. 28, 2026 at 2:20am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A new report reveals that former President Donald Trump has made significant investments in the nuclear fusion industry, including a merger between his media company and a major fusion energy developer. This has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the undermining of nuclear safety regulations under the Trump administration.

Why it matters

Trump's financial stake in the nuclear industry he has actively promoted, including efforts to gut safety oversight and accelerate approvals, raises serious ethical questions about his motivations and the potential risks to public safety. As a major investor, Trump now has a direct financial interest in the success of nuclear power, which could compromise his ability to objectively regulate the industry.

The details

The report details how Trump's company, Truth Social, has become a part-owner of TAE Technologies, a fusion energy company. This merger comes as the Trump administration has sought to expedite nuclear power approvals and weaken radiation exposure standards. Critics argue this gives Trump a clear financial incentive to support nuclear power at the expense of renewable energy alternatives. Experts also warn that fusion reactors come with their own unique safety and environmental challenges that have been downplayed by proponents.

  • In June 2026, Trump fired Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Christopher T. Hanson, the first time a president has ever fired an NRC commissioner.
  • Earlier in 2026, over 100 NRC staff were purged by Elon Musk's DOGE operation, further weakening nuclear oversight.

The players

Donald Trump

The former president of the United States who has made significant investments in the nuclear fusion industry and has taken steps to undermine nuclear safety regulations.

TAE Technologies

A fusion energy company that has merged with Trump's media company, Truth Social, giving the former president a financial stake in the nuclear fusion industry.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

The federal agency responsible for overseeing the safety of nuclear power in the United States, which has seen significant staffing changes and a weakening of its regulatory powers under the Trump administration.

Richard Painter

A former White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush who has criticized Trump's conflicts of interest in the nuclear industry.

Peter Bradford

A former member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission who has expressed concerns about the Trump administration's efforts to accelerate nuclear power development without proper safety oversight.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“There is a clear conflict of interest here. Every other president since the Civil War has divested from business interests that would conflict with official duties. President Trump has done the opposite.”

— Richard Painter, Former White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush

“Having the president and his family have a large stake in a particular energy source is very problematic.”

— Peter Bradford, Former member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

What’s next

The deal between Trump's Truth Social and TAE Technologies will need to be approved by federal regulators, some of whom were nominated by Trump, raising further concerns about conflicts of interest. Congress is expected to provide oversight to ensure that any government support for fusion research and development benefits the public, not just the Trump family's financial interests.

The takeaway

Trump's direct financial stake in the nuclear industry he has championed, combined with his administration's efforts to weaken safety regulations and oversight, pose serious ethical concerns about the former president's motivations and the potential risks to public safety. This case highlights the need for strict conflict-of-interest rules and divestment requirements for elected officials to prevent personal financial interests from compromising the public good.