Trump Attempts Poetry in State of the Union, Fails

The former president's speech was more salesman's patter than profound oratory.

Published on Feb. 25, 2026

In his 2026 State of the Union address, former President Trump attempted to deliver a more poetic and inspirational conclusion to his speech, but critics say he fell flat, resorting to a "salesman's tired patter" instead of genuine eloquence.

Why it matters

Trump's State of the Union speeches have often been criticized for their divisive rhetoric and lack of substance. His attempt to end on a more unifying, patriotic note was seen by many as an awkward and unsuccessful departure from his usual style.

The details

Towards the end of his lengthy address, Trump tried to strike a more elevated, poetic tone, waxing about America's history of innovation, exploration, and global leadership. However, the author argues that Trump "never made it past a salesman's tired patter" and that his attempts at profundity fell flat. The speech was otherwise filled with Trump's "poisonous stew of arrant bullshit and xenophobic detritus", including attacks on Democrats and self-congratulatory awards.

  • Trump delivered the 2026 State of the Union address on Tuesday, February 25th.

The players

Donald Trump

The former president of the United States who delivered the 2026 State of the Union address.

Mike Johnson

The Speaker of the House who was seated behind Trump during the address.

Connor Hellebuyck

A gold-medal winning goalie who Trump awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom during the speech.

Tom Nichols

A writer for The Atlantic who criticized Trump's State of the Union as more akin to a game show than a presidential address.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This wasn't a presidential address. It was some weird combination of a game show and the old Jerry Lewis Labor Day Telethon.”

— Tom Nichols, Writer, The Atlantic (The Atlantic)

The takeaway

Trump's attempts to strike a more elevated, poetic tone in his 2026 State of the Union address were widely panned, with critics arguing he reverted to his typical divisive rhetoric and salesman-like delivery rather than delivering a truly inspirational or unifying message.