- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Judge Rejects Live Nation's Bid to Dismiss Lawsuit Alleging Ticketmaster Monopoly
The decision clears the way for a potential antitrust trial over Live Nation's alleged dominance of the live concert industry.
Published on Feb. 23, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A federal judge has rejected Live Nation Entertainment's attempt to dismiss a lawsuit by the U.S. Department of Justice, 39 states, and Washington, D.C., accusing the company of illegally trying to monopolize the live concert industry. The judge ruled that there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Live Nation has used monopoly power to foreclose competition, clearing the way for a possible antitrust trial in Manhattan federal court.
Why it matters
The lawsuit alleges that Live Nation, through its ownership of Ticketmaster, has monopolized markets for ticketing, concert-booking, venues, and promotions, harming both fans and performers. This decision comes after years of public and political pressure to re-examine Live Nation's 2010 purchase of Ticketmaster, which many believe has led to anti-competitive practices and higher prices for concertgoers.
The details
The judge rejected Live Nation's arguments that it did not exercise monopoly power and that there was no evidence of harm to 'consumer welfare.' The judge said the government plaintiffs can try to prove that Live Nation improperly tied the use of its amphitheaters to concert promotion services, and illegally dominated the market for ticketing services to major concert venues. The judge also said states can try to seek damages for ticket-buying fans, saying it was 'reasonably foreseeable' that fans might have been harmed.
- The lawsuit was filed in May 2024 by the Department of Justice, 39 states, and Washington, D.C.
- Jury selection for the potential antitrust trial is scheduled to begin on March 2.
The players
Live Nation Entertainment
A Beverly Hills, California-based entertainment company that owns Ticketmaster and is accused of illegally trying to monopolize the live concert industry.
U.S. Department of Justice
The federal agency that filed the lawsuit against Live Nation, along with 39 states and Washington, D.C.
Judge Arun Subramanian
The U.S. District Judge who rejected Live Nation's bid to dismiss the lawsuit.
What they’re saying
“There is a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Live Nation has used monopoly power to foreclose competition.”
— Judge Arun Subramanian, U.S. District Judge
What’s next
The judge's decision clears the way for a potential antitrust trial, with jury selection scheduled to begin on March 2.
The takeaway
This lawsuit highlights the ongoing concerns about Live Nation's dominance of the live concert industry and the impact it has had on fans and performers. The judge's rejection of Live Nation's attempt to dismiss the case suggests the government and states may have a strong case to prove anti-competitive practices and seek remedies to address the alleged monopolization.


