AI Productivity Has 'Intense' Downside, Study Finds

Berkeley researchers document negative effects of generative AI on employee work, including burnout and lower-quality output.

Published on Feb. 14, 2026

A new study from UC Berkeley researchers Aruna Ranganathan and Xingqi Maggie Ye found that employees who enthusiastically adopted generative AI tools at a tech company worked at a faster pace, took on a broader scope of tasks, and worked longer hours - often without being asked. However, this surge in productivity proved unsustainable, leading to burnout, cognitive fatigue, and weakened decision-making. The researchers observed employees blurring the lines between work and non-work, taking on more multitasking, and expanding their responsibilities beyond their normal roles.

Why it matters

As AI evangelists like Elon Musk and Bill Gates promise a future with less work, this study suggests the reality may be more complex. While AI can boost productivity in the short term, the researchers warn that the changes it brings can be 'unsustainable, causing problems down the line' for employees. This highlights the need for employers to carefully manage the transition to generative AI tools to protect worker wellbeing.

The details

Over an 8-month period, the researchers conducted in-person observations, monitored internal communications, and interviewed 40 employees across engineering, product, design, research, and operations. They found that generative AI intensified work in three main ways: task expansion (employees taking on more responsibilities), blurred work/non-work boundaries (squeezing work into breaks), and increased multitasking (managing multiple active tasks simultaneously). This led to burnout, fatigue, and lower-quality work.

  • The study was conducted from April to December 2025.

The players

Aruna Ranganathan

A researcher at UC Berkeley who co-authored the study on the effects of generative AI on employee work.

Xingqi Maggie Ye

A researcher at UC Berkeley who co-authored the study on the effects of generative AI on employee work.

Elon Musk

The CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, who has made optimistic predictions about AI reducing the need for work.

Bill Gates

The co-founder of Microsoft, who has also suggested AI could enable a 2-3 day workweek in the future.

Sam Altman

The CEO of OpenAI, a leading AI research company.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The changes brought about by enthusiastic AI adoption can be unsustainable, causing problems down the line.”

— Aruna Ranganathan and Xingqi Maggie Ye, Researchers, UC Berkeley

“Once the excitement of experimenting fades, workers can find that their workload has quietly grown and feel stretched from juggling everything that's suddenly on their plate.”

— Aruna Ranganathan and Xingqi Maggie Ye, Researchers, UC Berkeley

What’s next

The researchers suggest that employers should implement more intentional pauses or dedicated break periods for employees, as well as sequencing work to avoid constant activity and 'siloing' of employees from the rest of the company.

The takeaway

This study highlights the potential downsides of the rapid adoption of generative AI tools in the workplace, showing how increased productivity can lead to burnout and other negative consequences for employees if not properly managed by employers. It serves as a cautionary tale about the need to carefully balance the benefits and risks of AI in the workplace.