- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Target Protests: ICE Boycott Calls Grow After Minneapolis Arrests
Consumers wield purchasing power to protest government policies and corporate stances on immigration.
Jan. 31, 2026 at 9:39pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Recent demonstrations targeting retail giant Target, sparked by federal immigration enforcement actions in Minneapolis, represent a growing trend of consumers wielding their purchasing power to protest government policies and corporate stances on immigration. The protests center on calls for Target to condemn ICE operations, particularly those occurring in or near its stores, and demand the retailer ban ICE from its properties and advocate for an independent investigation.
Why it matters
The Target protests highlight a critical intersection between the perceived complicity of private businesses in government enforcement actions and the increasing consumer activism around social and political issues. This trend signals a fundamental shift in the relationship between businesses, consumers, and immigration policy, as consumers demand that companies take a stand on issues that matter.
The details
The core grievance stems from incidents where federal agents detained individuals, some of whom were later identified as U.S. citizens, within Target premises. This has ignited outrage, with protesters demanding the retailer ban ICE from its properties and advocate for an independent investigation into the events. The situation highlights a critical intersection: the perceived complicity of private businesses in government enforcement actions. This isn't the first time Target has faced boycott calls, as previous campaigns focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies demonstrate a pattern of the company becoming a focal point for broader social and political debates.
- The protests, organized by groups like 50501 and Free DC, have been ongoing since February 2026.
The players
Target
A retail giant that has faced growing calls for boycotts and protests over its perceived complicity in federal immigration enforcement actions.
50501
A grassroots organization that has been leading the protests and calls for boycotts against Target.
Free DC
Another group organizing protests and boycotts against Target over its handling of federal immigration enforcement actions.
What they’re saying
“We must hold Target accountable for its role in enabling ICE's harmful actions in our communities.”
— Spokesperson, 50501
What’s next
The protests are ongoing, and it remains to be seen if Target will take any concrete actions to address the protesters' demands, such as banning ICE from its properties or advocating for an independent investigation.
The takeaway
The Target protests are symptomatic of a larger trend of consumer activism, where customers are increasingly wielding their purchasing power to influence corporate policies and stances on social and political issues, particularly around immigration. This shift signals a new era of corporate accountability and the growing power of consumers to shape the ethical landscape of businesses.
Berkeley top stories
Berkeley events
Mar. 22, 2026
Liz Cooper

