- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Springerville Today
By the People, for the People
Springerville Coal Plant Closure Signals National Shift Away from Coal
Economic factors and rise of renewable energy drive accelerating coal plant retirements across the US
Published on Feb. 23, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The Springerville coal plant in Arizona, co-owned by Tucson Electric Power, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, and Salt River Project, is the latest in a series of coal plant closures happening across the United States. Rising costs, aging infrastructure, and the decreasing price of renewable energy sources like solar are making coal-fired power generation increasingly uncompetitive, leading plant owners to transition away from coal.
Why it matters
The closure of the Springerville plant is indicative of a broader national trend of coal plant retirements driven by economic factors. As coal becomes less cost-effective compared to natural gas and renewable energy, more plant operators are making the decision to phase out coal and transition to cleaner, more affordable power sources. This shift has significant implications for the energy industry, workers, and communities that have historically relied on coal.
The details
Tucson Electric Power, a co-owner of the Springerville plant, is converting its share of the plant's capacity to natural gas, citing the volatile and rising costs of coal as well as concerns about the reliability of coal supply chains. Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, another co-owner, has announced plans to close its Unit 3 at Springerville and replace the power with 1,250 megawatts of renewable energy by 2031. The Salt River Project remains the only owner without a publicly announced retirement date for its unit at the plant.
- In 2025, six units across four plants in the western US have already ceased burning coal.
- Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association plans to close its Unit 3 at Springerville and replace the power with 1,250 megawatts of renewable energy by 2031.
The players
Tucson Electric Power
A co-owner of the Springerville coal plant that is converting its share of the plant's capacity to natural gas.
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association
A co-owner of the Springerville plant that has announced plans to close its Unit 3 and replace the power with 1,250 megawatts of renewable energy by 2031.
Salt River Project
The only remaining owner of the Springerville plant without a publicly announced retirement date for its unit.
Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA)
An organization that has analyzed the trend of coal plant closures across the US, including the six units that have ceased burning coal in the western region in 2025.
Western Resource Advocates
A nonprofit organization that collaborated with Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association on its decision to close the Springerville Unit 3 and transition to renewable energy.
What’s next
Advocates are urging the Salt River Project, the only remaining owner without a publicly announced retirement date for its Springerville unit, to follow the lead of Tucson Electric Power and Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association and evaluate the continued reliance on coal-fired power from the plant.
The takeaway
The closure of the Springerville coal plant is part of a broader national trend driven by the rising costs of coal, the decreasing price of renewable energy, and concerns about the reliability of coal supply chains. This shift signals an accelerating transition away from coal-fired power generation towards cleaner, more cost-effective energy sources like natural gas and renewable energy.
