DNA Evidence Found at Nancy Guthrie's Home Doesn't Match Family

Investigators discover DNA and gloves near the kidnapped woman's residence, but not inside the home

Published on Feb. 14, 2026

Authorities in Pima County, Arizona have revealed new details about the investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie. While several gloves were found in the vicinity of Guthrie's home, none were located inside the residence. Additionally, DNA evidence recovered at the scene does not belong to Guthrie or anyone close to her. The sheriff's department has stated that reports of a glove being found inside the home are inaccurate.

Why it matters

The discovery of unidentified DNA and gloves near the home where Guthrie was kidnapped provides new clues for investigators, but also raises additional questions about who may have been involved and how they accessed the property. This development could be a significant break in the high-profile case that has gripped the local community.

The details

According to the Pima County Sheriff's Department, several gloves were found in the area around Guthrie's home, with one located as close as 2 miles away. However, no gloves were actually discovered inside the residence itself, contrary to previous reports. The department also confirmed that DNA evidence recovered at the scene does not match Guthrie or anyone in her immediate circle.

  • The DNA and gloves were discovered during the ongoing investigation into Nancy Guthrie's disappearance.

The players

Pima County Sheriff's Department

The law enforcement agency leading the investigation into Nancy Guthrie's kidnapping.

Nancy Guthrie

The woman who was kidnapped from her home in Pima County, Arizona.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Reports that a glove was found inside the residence or on the property are inaccurate.”

— Pima County Sheriff's Department (ABC News)

The takeaway

The discovery of unidentified DNA and gloves near Nancy Guthrie's home provides new leads for investigators, but also raises more questions about who may have been involved in her disappearance and how they accessed the property. This development could be a significant breakthrough in the high-profile case.