- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Pima Today
By the People, for the People
Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest Face Privacy Concerns
The controversies highlight the importance of choosing a camera brand you can trust.
Published on Feb. 14, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Amazon's Ring security cameras and Google's Nest cameras have faced public scrutiny over privacy issues in recent months. Ring has faced criticism for its partnerships with law enforcement and surveillance companies, while Google was able to recover deleted Nest camera footage in an emergency situation, raising questions about data retention. These controversies serve as a reminder that consumers need to carefully consider the privacy and security practices of the camera brands they choose to use in their homes.
Why it matters
As smart home devices become more ubiquitous, the way companies handle user data and footage from security cameras is an important privacy concern. The actions of Ring and Nest show that consumers need to be vigilant about understanding a company's data practices and partnerships before trusting them with sensitive information like home security footage.
The details
Ring has faced criticism for its partnerships with law enforcement and surveillance companies like Flock Safety, which operate license plate readers and other surveillance technology. While Ring has made some changes to limit law enforcement access to user footage, the company's continued entanglement with these types of partnerships has raised alarms among privacy advocates. Meanwhile, Google was able to recover deleted Nest camera footage in an emergency situation, even though the company's policies state that non-subscribers' footage is only stored for 6 hours before being deleted. This raises questions about Google's data retention practices and the extent to which it will share user data with law enforcement.
- In 2024, Ring sunset its 'Request for Assistance' feature that allowed law enforcement to directly request customer videos.
- This week, Amazon announced it was canceling a planned integration between Ring and the surveillance company Flock Safety.
The players
Ring
An Amazon-owned security camera brand that has faced criticism for its partnerships with law enforcement and surveillance companies.
Nest
A Google-owned smart home brand that includes security cameras, which recently recovered deleted footage in an emergency situation.
Flock Safety
A surveillance company that operates license plate readers, cameras, and gunfire locators across 49 states, capturing data that is searchable by law enforcement without a warrant.
What’s next
Google has not yet responded to questions about how it recovered the deleted Nest camera footage and its data retention practices, so further clarification from the company is still pending.
The takeaway
These controversies highlight the importance of consumers thoroughly researching the privacy and security practices of the smart home camera brands they choose to use. Opting for devices with end-to-end encryption and local storage can help ensure greater control over sensitive data.
