Pima County Sheriff investigates pacemaker interference

Authorities look into concerning report that Nancy Guthrie's pacemaker stopped syncing.

Feb. 4, 2026 at 2:47am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has stated that authorities are investigating a concerning report that the pacemaker of local resident Nancy Guthrie stopped syncing. While details are still emerging, the sheriff indicated that more than just a technical malfunction may be involved, raising questions about whether Guthrie was intentionally targeted.

Why it matters

Pacemaker interference or tampering could pose serious risks to public safety and individual health, especially for vulnerable residents. This case highlights the need to ensure the security and reliability of medical devices, particularly as technology becomes more integrated into daily life.

The details

According to the sheriff, Guthrie's pacemaker, which helps regulate her heart rhythm, suddenly stopped syncing for an unknown reason. Authorities are now looking into the possibility that the device may have been tampered with or interfered with, rather than just a technical malfunction.

  • On February 2, 2026, Nancy Guthrie reported issues with her pacemaker.
  • On February 3, 2026, the Pima County Sheriff's Office opened an investigation into the incident.

The players

Chris Nanos

The Pima County Sheriff who is overseeing the investigation into the pacemaker interference incident.

Nancy Guthrie

A local resident whose pacemaker reportedly stopped syncing, prompting the investigation.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must get to the bottom of this concerning report and ensure the safety of our residents. The security of medical devices is of the utmost importance.”

— Chris Nanos, Pima County Sheriff

What’s next

The Pima County Sheriff's Office has stated they will continue investigating the incident to determine if any criminal activity was involved in the pacemaker interference.

The takeaway

This case highlights the need for robust security measures to protect vulnerable individuals who rely on medical devices, as well as the importance of investigating any potential tampering or interference with such critical equipment.