- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Maricopa Today
By the People, for the People
Trump Calls for Revisiting 2020 Election Integrity
Former president cites 'The Navarro Report' in pushing for further investigation of disputed ballots before January 6th events.
Published on Feb. 26, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Former President Trump is calling for a renewed examination of the 2020 presidential election, citing the findings of 'The Navarro Report' which detailed legal disputes, administrative decisions, and statistical anomalies that defined the 2020 election cycle. Trump argues that when ballot volume expands while verification standards weaken, political operatives can alter the outcome of a close election, as allegedly occurred in key battleground states like Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.
Why it matters
The debate over the integrity of the 2020 election has become a separation-of-powers fight over who writes the rules of federal elections and who enforces them. Trump's push for voter identification, restored signature verification, and consistent enforcement is seen as a credible path to restoring public confidence in the electoral process, which has been shaken with over 40% of Americans now lacking confidence in presidential vote counting.
The details
The Navarro Report, compiled by Trump advisor Peter Navarro, draws on affidavits, court filings, contemporaneous reporting and documented rule changes to examine the legal disputes, administrative decisions and statistical anomalies that defined the 2020 election cycle. It argues that when ballot volume expands while verification standards weaken, political operatives can alter the outcome of a close election. For example, in Georgia the rejection rate for absentee ballots collapsed from nearly 7% in 2016 to a fraction of 1% in 2020, as the state rewrote signature-review procedures just as Democrats were shifting massively to absentee voting. Similar patterns played out in other key battleground states.
- In March 2020, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger entered into a settlement that rewrote signature-review procedures statewide, just as Democrats were shifting massively to absentee voting.
- In 2016, Georgia rejected nearly 7% of absentee ballots. In 2020, that rejection rate collapsed to a fraction of 1%.
The players
Peter Navarro
The White House senior counselor for trade and manufacturing who compiled 'The Navarro Report' examining the 2020 election.
Brad Raffensperger
The Georgia Secretary of State who entered into a settlement in March 2020 that rewrote signature-review procedures statewide.
Donald Trump
The former president who is calling for a renewed examination of the 2020 presidential election, citing the findings of 'The Navarro Report'.
What they’re saying
“The core safeguard for in-person voting is identity verification at check-in, often including photo ID, as the SAVE Act would require nationwide for federal registration. For absentee ballots, the principal safeguard is envelope verification, especially signature matching.”
— Peter Navarro, White House Senior Counselor (The Washington Times)
“When you remove controls, you increase risk. When you weaken verification, you invite abuse. When you prevent meaningful audits, you destroy public confidence.”
— Peter Navarro, White House Senior Counselor (The Washington Times)
What’s next
The debate over the 2020 election's integrity is expected to continue, with Trump and his allies pushing for further investigations and reforms to election procedures, while critics dismiss such efforts as attempts to undermine confidence in the democratic process.
The takeaway
The 2020 election has become a flashpoint in the ongoing battle over who controls the rules and enforcement of federal elections, with Trump and his supporters arguing that weakened verification standards opened the door to potential fraud, while opponents dismiss such claims as 'election denialism.' Restoring public trust in the electoral process remains a key challenge facing the nation.


