Ole Miss QB Granted Sixth Season of Eligibility

Fans criticize Trinidad Chambliss for staying in college over joining the NFL

Published on Feb. 13, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss has been granted a sixth season of eligibility by a Mississippi state court, despite previously being denied by the NCAA. This has drawn criticism from fans who call Chambliss "pathetic" for trying so hard to stay in college rather than turn pro. However, Chambliss is now considered a strong contender for major college football awards in 2026.

Why it matters

The NCAA's decision to deny Chambliss additional eligibility was overturned in court, highlighting ongoing tensions between the NCAA and student-athletes over rules governing playing time. Chambliss' case also reflects a growing trend of players extending their college careers, which some view as a lack of mental toughness to turn pro.

The details

Chambliss, who is six days older than New England Patriots QB Drake Maye, was granted the extra season of eligibility after a dispute over his health waivers. This allows him to start the 2026 season, similar to how Vanderbilt's Diego Pavia was able to contend for the Heisman Trophy after being granted an extra year. Fans have criticized Chambliss, calling his actions "pathetic" and arguing there should be a 5-year maximum on college eligibility.

  • Chambliss was granted a sixth season of eligibility by a Mississippi state court.

The players

Trinidad Chambliss

The Ole Miss quarterback who was granted a sixth season of eligibility, drawing criticism from fans.

Diego Pavia

The Vanderbilt player who was granted an extra year of eligibility and went on to contend for the Heisman Trophy.

Drake Maye

The New England Patriots quarterback who is six days younger than Chambliss.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Trinidad Chambliss to remain eligible for the 2026 season.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing debate over NCAA rules and the desire of some players to extend their college careers, even if it means delaying their professional aspirations. It raises questions about the appropriate balance between player development and the NCAA's eligibility guidelines.