Alabama Lawmakers Seek to Limit State Environmental Regulations

Bill would prevent state from setting rules stricter than federal standards unless 'manifest bodily harm' is proven

Published on Feb. 22, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Alabama Legislature has approved legislation backed by business groups that would prevent state agencies from setting environmental restrictions exceeding those set by the federal government. The bill would make it difficult for the state to adopt new rules in areas where no federal standard exists, requiring a 'direct causal link' between exposure and 'manifest bodily harm' to humans. Environmental groups say the measure would cripple the state's ability to respond to environmental or health risks.

Why it matters

This legislation is part of a broader effort by some Republican-led states to restrict their ability to set environmental regulations, following the deregulatory agenda of the Trump administration. Critics argue it would prioritize business interests over public health and the environment, while supporters say it would prevent 'regulatory overreach' and keep costs down for businesses.

The details

The Alabama bill would bar state agencies from setting restrictions on pollutants and hazardous substances that exceed federal standards. Where no federal standard exists, the state could only adopt new rules if there is a 'direct causal link' between exposure and 'manifest bodily harm' to humans. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups supported the legislation, which the sponsor said would help Alabama 'compete' for businesses. Environmental groups argue the bill sets an 'impossible hurdle' for new state regulations and could be used to challenge existing rules.

  • The Alabama Legislature approved the legislation on Tuesday, February 18, 2026.

The players

Alabama Legislature

The state legislature in Alabama that approved the legislation to limit state environmental regulations.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

A business advocacy group that supported the Alabama legislation.

Sen. Donnie Chesteen

The Republican sponsor of the Alabama bill, who described it as a 'pro-business' piece of legislation.

Sarah Stokes

A senior attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center, who criticized the Alabama bill for setting an 'impossible hurdle' for new state regulations.

Cara Horowitz

An environmental law professor and executive director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA School of Law, who said the legislation would prevent state agencies from making 'independent decisions about how much to protect public health.'

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“It's a blank check to businesses. We're basically sacrificing human health for businesses. That doesn't seem like the best calculation for our citizens.”

— Sarah Stokes, Senior Attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center

“Alabama could adopt its own pollution standard only where the state's rationale for doing so relies on a very particular kind of science. Alabama could not rely, for example, on studies showing a correlation between pollution exposure and an increased risk of disease.”

— Cara Horowitz, Environmental Law Professor and Executive Director, Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA School of Law

“We are a petri dish for businesses to do as they will until they kill people.”

— Rep. Chris England, Alabama State Representative

What’s next

The bill now goes to Republican Governor Kay Ivey, who has not yet indicated whether she will sign it into law.

The takeaway

This legislation in Alabama is part of a broader trend in some Republican-led states to limit their ability to set environmental regulations that are stricter than federal standards, prioritizing business interests over public health and environmental protection. Critics argue it will hamper states' ability to respond to emerging environmental and health risks.