Alabama Lawmakers Seek to Limit State Environmental Regulations

The bill would prevent state agencies from setting restrictions on pollutants and hazardous substances exceeding federal standards.

Published on Feb. 21, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Alabama Legislature has approved a bill backed by business groups that would prevent state agencies from setting environmental regulations stricter than federal standards. Supporters say the measure will ground standards in 'sound science' and prevent regulatory overreach, while opponents argue it will cripple the state's ability to respond to environmental or health risks.

Why it matters

This legislation is part of a broader effort by some Republican-led states to limit their own environmental regulations following the deregulatory agenda of the Trump administration. Critics say the bill will prioritize business interests over public health and the environment, while supporters argue it will help the state attract new businesses.

The details

The Alabama bill would require the state to demonstrate a 'direct causal link' between exposure to harmful emissions and 'manifest bodily harm' to humans in order to adopt new environmental rules where no federal standard exists. It also bars the use of the EPA's Integrated Risk Information System as the basis for water quality standards. Opponents say this sets an 'impossible hurdle' for state regulations and amounts to 'sacrificing human health for businesses'.

  • The Alabama Legislature approved the bill on Tuesday, February 18, 2026.
  • Last year, Indiana's governor signed an executive order saying the state can't have new environmental rules stricter than federal ones unless deemed necessary by state law or the governor.
  • In 2025, Tennessee lawmakers passed legislation requiring any regulations more stringent than federal rules to be based on links to 'manifest bodily harm in humans'.

The players

Alabama Legislature

The state legislature in Alabama that approved the bill to limit state environmental regulations.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

A business group that supported the Alabama legislation.

Donnie Chesteen

The Republican state senator who sponsored the Alabama bill, describing it as a 'pro-business' piece of legislation.

Sarah Stokes

A senior attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center who criticized the Alabama bill for setting an 'impossible hurdle' for state regulations.

Cara Horowitz

An environmental law professor and executive director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA School of Law, who said the Alabama legislation would prevent state agencies from making 'independent decisions about how much to protect public health'.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“If we're going to be able to compete with states in the Southeast to attract and bring some of these businesses in, then we need to have these standards adopted so that it's clearly defined what our companies are working with.”

— Donnie Chesteen, Republican state senator (Associated Press)

“This does not remove the use of sound science and legitimate science. What it does is protect Alabama and the people of Alabama from runaway government that can become overly burdensome and regulatory to a point that it drives the cost of living way up.”

— Troy Stubbs, Republican state representative (Associated Press)

“We are a petri dish for businesses to do as they will until they kill people.”

— Chris England, Democratic state representative (Associated Press)

“It's a blank check to businesses. We're basically sacrificing human health for businesses. That doesn't seem like the best calculation for our citizens.”

— Sarah Stokes, Senior attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center (Associated Press)

What’s next

The bill now goes to Republican Governor Kay Ivey, who has not yet indicated whether she will sign it into law.

The takeaway

This legislation is part of a broader trend of some Republican-led states seeking to limit their own environmental regulations in the wake of the Trump administration's deregulatory agenda. Critics argue it prioritizes business interests over public health and the environment, while supporters say it will help attract new companies to the state.