Trump Administration Rule Reclassifies 50,000 Federal Jobs, Sparking Legal Challenges

The new policy strips civil service protections, prompting backlash from unions and advocacy groups.

Published on Feb. 5, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Trump administration has issued a rule allowing federal agencies to reclassify approximately 50,000 senior employees into at-will positions with reduced job protections. The controversial measure creates a new "Schedule Policy/Career" category for federal workers involved in policy decisions, removing their ability to appeal disciplinary actions or terminations before an independent body.

Why it matters

The rule aims to address situations where "agency supervisors report great difficulty removing employees for poor performance or misconduct." However, critics argue it creates a "pseudo political appointee class" that could influence traditionally nonpartisan government functions like prosecutions, grant awards, and emergency relief distribution.

The details

The policy stems from a first-day executive order President Trump signed last year, reviving a similar 2020 directive known as "Schedule F" that President Biden had reversed. Biden's administration finalized additional worker protections in 2024, which Thursday's rule now rescinds. A coalition of over 30 unions and advocacy groups immediately promised legal action, stating the measure "allows the government to bypass existing civil service laws, strips employees of earned protections, and opens the door to politically motivated firings and hirings."

  • The Trump administration issued the rule on Thursday, February 6, 2026.
  • President Trump signed the original executive order on his first day in office last year.
  • President Biden had reversed the similar "Schedule F" directive in 2020.

The players

Donald Trump

The former President of the United States who signed the original executive order that led to this new rule.

Joe Biden

The current President of the United States who had reversed the similar "Schedule F" directive in 2020, but whose administration's additional worker protections are now being rescinded by this new rule.

Skye Perryman

The CEO of Democracy Forward, a coalition of over 30 unions and advocacy groups that immediately promised legal action against the new rule.

Everett Kelley

The national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, who warned the change could silence federal workers.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The measure allows the government to bypass existing civil service laws, strips employees of earned protections, and opens the door to politically motivated firings and hirings.”

— Skye Perryman, CEO of Democracy Forward (CNN)

“A professional civil service means nurses and doctors can advocate for patient safety, inspectors can report violations, cybersecurity experts can warn about threats.”

— Everett Kelley, National President of the American Federation of Government Employees (CNN)

What’s next

A coalition of over 30 unions and advocacy groups immediately promised legal action against the new rule.

The takeaway

This rule represents a significant rollback of civil service protections, raising concerns about the potential for politically motivated firings and hirings within the federal government. The legal challenges from unions and advocacy groups will be crucial in determining the ultimate impact of this policy change.