Letters to the Editor Criticize Operation Epic Fury

NY Post readers debate President Trump's military actions in Iran

Mar. 22, 2026 at 7:22pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

NY Post readers have written letters to the editor criticizing President Trump's Operation Epic Fury military actions in Iran. The letters debate whether the operation was justified, with some calling it unnecessary and a violation of Trump's anti-interventionist campaign promises, while others argue it was needed to address Iran's destabilizing influence. The letters also touch on the human toll of the operation, including civilian casualties.

Why it matters

The letters highlight the ongoing political debate around the use of military force and America's role in the Middle East. They reflect the divisive nature of Trump's foreign policy decisions and the challenges he faces in balancing his campaign promises with perceived national security threats.

The details

The letters discuss a range of criticisms of Operation Epic Fury, including that it was unjustified, unnecessary, and has led to the deaths of innocent civilians. Some writers argue that Iran has been a destabilizing force for decades and that destroying its military was needed for global safety. Others claim Trump campaigned as an anti-interventionist but has since launched military actions in multiple countries, making him a "liar and a war criminal."

  • Operation Epic Fury was launched in early 2026, during President Trump's second term.

The players

President Trump

The President of the United States who launched Operation Epic Fury in Iran.

David Kahn

A reader from Boca Raton, Florida who wrote a letter criticizing Operation Epic Fury.

Larry Hootnick

A reader from Watermill who wrote a letter supporting Operation Epic Fury to address Iran's destabilizing influence.

Anthony Parks

A reader from Garden City who wrote a letter praising Trump for taking action against "Christian- and Jew-hating monsters" in Iran.

Phil Serpico

A reader from Queens who wrote a letter arguing Operation Epic Fury was not justified or necessary.

Mark Kilyk

A reader from Birmingham, Alabama who wrote a letter calling Trump a "liar and a war criminal" for launching military strikes despite campaign promises to end "forever wars."

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Until President Trump 'feels it in his bones,' American aircraft will crash, rockets and drones will fly, billions of dollars will be wasted and more innocent Iranians, Qataris, Lebanese, and Israeli civilians and American service members will die or be maimed.”

— David Kahn

“Destroying Iran's military will lead to a much safer world for all of us.”

— Larry Hootnick

“Trump has at long last taken the initiative to rid the world of these Christian- and Jew-hating monsters. Generations to come will look back on this war with gratitude.”

— Anthony Parks

“Operation Epic Fury was neither justified nor necessary. There was no believable immediate threat. I think Trump had visions of regime change when he agreed to the assault, hoping people would rise up.”

— Phil Serpico

“Trump campaigned as an anti-interventionist, pledging to end 'forever wars.' However, since the start of his second term, he's launched military strikes or actions in seven countries. Now US bombs have hit a school in Iran, killing at least 165 children — yet our president has demanded a Nobel Peace Prize. He's not a man of peace but a liar and a war criminal.”

— Mark Kilyk

The takeaway

The letters to the editor reflect the deep political divisions over President Trump's use of military force in Iran through Operation Epic Fury. While some readers support the action as necessary to address Iran's destabilizing influence, others condemn it as unjustified and a violation of Trump's campaign promises. The debate highlights the ongoing challenges in American foreign policy and the toll military interventions can take on both soldiers and civilians.