Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch Criticizes Congress on Tariffs

Conservative justice calls on lawmakers to fulfill their constitutional duties

Published on Feb. 25, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

In a strongly worded letter, conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has taken the legislative branch to task for its failure to fulfill its constitutional responsibilities, particularly regarding the imposition of tariffs which are the purview of Congress. Gorsuch's message was directed at Alaska's Senator Dan Sullivan and Representative Nick Begich, urging them to do their jobs and not abdicate their power to the executive branch.

Why it matters

Gorsuch's rebuke of Congress highlights the growing tensions between the branches of government and the concerns over the legislative branch ceding its authority to the executive. This comes at a time of heightened political polarization, where lawmakers may be more focused on political survival than fulfilling their constitutional duties.

The details

In his letter, Gorsuch argued that tariffs are taxes, which are the responsibility of Congress, not the president. He criticized the legislators' apparent desire to avoid criticism from extremists and primary challengers, even at the cost of their public duty. Gorsuch's message was a stark warning to lawmakers that they must uphold their constitutional obligations, regardless of political consequences.

  • Gorsuch's letter was published on February 25, 2026.

The players

Neil Gorsuch

A conservative justice on the Supreme Court of the United States.

Dan Sullivan

A Republican senator representing the state of Alaska.

Nick Begich

A Republican representative for Alaska's at-large congressional district.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Tariffs are taxes, the purview of Congress. Further, they are the exact opposite of any trade policy ever considered 'conservative.'”

— Neil Gorsuch, Supreme Court Justice (adn.com)

The takeaway

Gorsuch's rebuke of Congress highlights the growing tensions between the branches of government and the concerns over the legislative branch ceding its authority to the executive. This case underscores the importance of lawmakers fulfilling their constitutional duties, even in the face of political pressures.