Alaska Senate Unanimously Passes Supplemental Spending Bill Amid Oil Price Surge

The $373 million bill draws from state savings to cover increased costs, buoyed by war-driven oil prices.

Mar. 12, 2026 at 2:28am

The Alaska Senate voted unanimously on Wednesday to advance a $373 million supplemental spending bill that will draw from the state's $3 billion Constitutional Budget Reserve to cover increased costs in the current fiscal year. The unexpected spike in oil prices, driven by the war in Iran, has brought in tens of millions in additional revenue, smoothing the way for Republican minority support and a smaller than expected draw from savings.

Why it matters

The supplemental spending bill addresses urgent funding needs, including $70 million for state transportation projects to leverage federal dollars, $98 million for fire suppression, and $40 million for disaster relief. However, lawmakers warn that the state cannot rely on war-driven oil prices to 'bail out' the budget in the long run, underscoring the need to find new revenue sources.

The details

The Senate bill eliminates roughly $50 million in previously projected funding needed from savings and $30 million in 'head room' included by the House. It also removes $78 million for unforeseen agency operations, which lawmakers say can now be covered by the higher oil revenues if prices remain elevated through the summer. The bill includes $130 million to recapitalize the Alaska Higher Education Investment Fund after lawmakers tapped it last year.

  • The Senate voted unanimously to advance the bill on Wednesday, March 11, 2026.
  • The House passed the supplemental budget bill in late February, five days before the attack on Iran began.

The players

Lyman Hoffman

A Bethel Democrat who co-chairs the Senate Finance Committee.

Bert Stedman

A Sitka Republican who co-chairs the Senate Finance Committee.

Bill Wielechowski

An Anchorage Democrat in the Senate.

Robert Yundt

A Wasilla Republican in the Senate.

Mike Cronk

The Senate Minority Leader, a Tok Republican.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Given the situation in the Middle East and the war, we have seen a spike in oil revenues, and I think that as a result of that, we are able to accomplish what I feel needs to be addressed for the state of Alaska, and also the concerns of many members of the minority.”

— Lyman Hoffman, Co-chair, Senate Finance Committee (adn.com)

“That doesn't look likely today with what's going on internationally. At the end of the day, in May, we will be leaving town with our bills paid.”

— Bert Stedman, Co-chair, Senate Finance Committee (adn.com)

“We potentially risk losing a construction season. That means your projects don't get built, your roads don't get fixed.”

— Bill Wielechowski, Senator (adn.com)

“Cooler heads prevailed today. We didn't walk into that room 20-0.”

— Robert Yundt, Senator (adn.com)

“I think that's part of our job, is to make sure that we can understand why the costs have increased so much.”

— Mike Cronk, Senate Minority Leader (adn.com)

What’s next

The bill now returns to the House, which must vote to accept or reject the changes made by the Senate. The Republican House minority has indicated they want to wait for an updated revenue forecast before voting on the bill.

The takeaway

This supplemental spending bill highlights Alaska's reliance on volatile oil revenues to fund government operations, and the challenges lawmakers face in balancing the state's budget amid unpredictable global events. While the war-driven oil price spike has provided a temporary revenue boost, lawmakers warn the state cannot depend on such windfalls in the long run, underscoring the need to diversify Alaska's revenue sources.