Alaska's Permanent Fund Faces Fiscal Challenges

Overspending and declining oil revenue threaten the state's financial stability

Published on Mar. 8, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Alaska's Permanent Fund, a constitutionally protected savings account, is facing significant fiscal challenges due to overspending and declining oil revenue. The state's 5% drawdown rate from the fund's Earnings Reserve Account (ERA) is depleting the account, raising the risk of a fiscal crisis. Experts argue that reducing the drawdown rate to 3%, similar to Norway's approach, would help preserve the fund's principal and ensure its longevity for future generations.

Why it matters

The Permanent Fund is a crucial financial resource for Alaska, providing funding for essential government services and the state's Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) program. Protecting the fund's principal and ensuring its long-term sustainability is crucial for the state's economic well-being and the financial security of its residents.

The details

Despite the constitutional protection of the Permanent Fund's principal, the state's 5% drawdown rate from the ERA has steadily depleted the account, raising the risk of a fiscal crisis. Experts argue that reducing the drawdown rate to 3%, similar to Norway's approach, would help preserve the fund's principal and ensure its longevity for future generations. The author also criticizes the state's 2013 decision to slash oil revenue, which has further exacerbated the state's financial challenges.

  • The 5% drawdown from the Permanent Fund's ERA has been in place since 2019.
  • The 2024 Trustees Report highlighted the increasing risk of depleting the ERA.

The players

Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation

The state-owned corporation responsible for managing and investing the Alaska Permanent Fund.

Norway's Wealth Fund

A $2 trillion sovereign wealth fund managed by the Norwegian government, which follows a 3% drawdown rate.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Thankfully, the principal is constitutionally protected; it cannot be spent by anyone unless we, the voters, give our representatives the ability to do so.”

— Joe Paskvan, Retired attorney and former Alaska state senator (Anchorage Daily News)

“The 3% solution is the answer.”

— Joe Paskvan, Retired attorney and former Alaska state senator (Anchorage Daily News)

What’s next

The Alaska legislature will need to consider reducing the Permanent Fund's drawdown rate from 5% to 3% in order to preserve the fund's principal and ensure its long-term sustainability.

The takeaway

Alaska's Permanent Fund, a crucial financial resource for the state, is facing significant fiscal challenges due to overspending and declining oil revenue. Reducing the drawdown rate from the fund's Earnings Reserve Account and addressing the state's revenue issues are essential to protecting the fund's principal and ensuring its longevity for future generations.