- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Alaska's Pension Problem Driving Away Workforce
Lack of retirement stability for public sector workers hurts recruitment and retention in the state.
Published on Mar. 5, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A longtime Alaskan public sector worker argues that the state's defined contribution retirement system, rather than a traditional pension, is making it difficult to attract and retain highly trained employees. The author says this is leading experienced workers to leave Alaska for better pay and benefits elsewhere, costing the state its investment in training these workers.
Why it matters
Alaska is the only state in the U.S. with this type of retirement system for public employees, putting it at a competitive disadvantage for hiring and keeping skilled workers like snowplow drivers, 911 dispatchers, and child welfare investigators. This could impact the state's ability to provide essential public services.
The details
The author, who has worked for a local government agency for over 25 years, says the defined contribution system was introduced despite warnings that it would create a "revolving door" of trained employees leaving for better opportunities outside Alaska. The author notes that public sector workers in Alaska do not pay into the Social Security system, leaving them with limited retirement savings and no safety net compared to private sector workers.
- The defined contribution system was introduced and debated several years ago.
- The author has worked for their agency for over 25 years, seeing the "before and after" of the retirement system change.
The players
Shawn O'Donnell
A 56-year lifelong Alaskan who has served his community for over a quarter century and earned a pension, and believes all workers deserve the same.
What they’re saying
“At the time it was being debated and introduced, it was pointed out that this bill would create a revolving door for highly trained and vetted employees. Sadly, that has turned out to be 100% correct.”
— Shawn O'Donnell
“Financial plans like 401(k)s and their brethren were not designed or ever intended to be a retirement vehicle. They were tax shelters during a time of high taxes on top earners.”
— Shawn O'Donnell
What’s next
The state legislature will likely continue to debate the merits of the current public employee retirement system and whether changes are needed to attract and retain skilled workers.
The takeaway
Alaska's unique public sector retirement system is hampering the state's ability to build and maintain a skilled workforce, as experienced employees leave for better pay and benefits elsewhere. Addressing this issue could help ensure the state can provide essential public services into the future.
