- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Trump's Unconstitutional War With Iran Sparks Outrage
Civilian casualties, lack of congressional approval raise concerns over executive overreach
Published on Mar. 12, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
President Trump has ordered a massive bombing campaign against Iran, resulting in the deaths of at least 1,300 Iranian civilians and 7 American service members in the first week alone. The operation, which has cost over $11 billion so far, has sparked outrage due to its apparent unconstitutionality, as the president did not seek congressional approval as previous administrations have done for similar military actions. Experts warn that the president's unilateral use of force sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the constitutional framework for declaring war.
Why it matters
The founders gave Congress the power to declare war, believing the executive branch was "most prone to it." However, in recent decades, presidents have increasingly deployed military force without congressional authorization, using legal loopholes and the reluctance of Congress to challenge them. This case highlights the erosion of the constitutional checks on the president's war powers, raising concerns about the implications for democracy and the rule of law.
The details
In three separate incidents since July, police say 45-year-old San Francisco resident Walker Reed Quinn has been damaging Waymo autonomous vehicles by removing and swinging his belt, placing a cone on the car's sensors, damaging tires and mirrors, and stomping on the windshield. Authorities have charged Quinn with several counts of vandalism, citing a perceived risk to public safety and ongoing questions about his mental health.
- On July 4, Quinn allegedly dove onto the hood of a Waymo vehicle and covered sensors.
- On July 29, Quinn allegedly damaged a Waymo's tires and driver's side mirror.
- On August 11, Quinn allegedly stomped on a windshield while someone was inside.
The players
Waymo
An American autonomous driving company and is a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., Google's parent company.
Walker Reed Quinn
A 45-year-old San Francisco resident who has a history of vandalism and was out on bail for prior cases related to Waymo vehicles.
What they’re saying
“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”
— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)
What’s next
The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.
The takeaway
This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.
New York top stories
New York events
Mar. 12, 2026
Wicked (NY)Mar. 12, 2026
The Banksy Museum New York!Mar. 12, 2026
Banksy Museum - Flexiticket



